Industrial Development Index and Plan Mexico: the compass for the new manufacturing cycle in Mexico

14 de Junio de 2024

Mexico is at a decisive moment in redefining its production model. The reconfiguration of supply chains in North America, the advance of nearshoring, and the need for competitive infrastructure have placed the Mexico Plan at the center of the conversation on economic growth. In this context, the analysis of the Industrial Development Index (IDI) and its relationship with the Economic Development Poles for Well-being allows us to understand more precisely where real capabilities exist to scale up manufacturing, what These regions concentrate immediate opportunities and where industrial development requires structural interventions to consolidate itself in the long term.

 

How does the FINSA Industrial Development Index work and why Is this a strategic map of Mexico?

The most recent analysis of the Industrial Development Index (IDI) offers insight into the current state of industrial development in Mexico.

By evaluating infrastructure, economic performance, social environment, sustainability, and technical training, the study identifies what This comprehensive vision makes the IDI a key tool for understanding the territorial implementation of the Mexico Plan, as well as such as its priorities in terms of competitiveness, supply chain, and regional strengthening.

 

What Does the relationship between the IDI and the PODECOBI reveal anything about industrial development in Mexico?

The articulation between the IDI and the PODECOBI allows for a clear interpretation of the new map of industrial development in the country.

       The IDI measures the level of preparation of each state to integrate into the new manufacturing cycle.

       The PODECOBIs represent the institutional strategy to guide investment, activate productive vocations, and strengthen regional value chains.

What industrial realities emerge when the IDI crosses with the PODECOBIs?

  1. Mature states with active manufacturing hubs, ready to scale up advanced manufacturing.
  2. Territories with structural gaps that already have instruments to close those gaps.
  3. Competitive regions without a formal manufacturing hub, representing immediate opportunities for expansion.
  4. Entities with deep challenges in talent, energy, connectivity and security.

This territorial matrix defines specific priorities within the Plan Mexico and guides public and private investment decisions.

 

What What role do accelerator poles play in the new manufacturing cycle?

Within this analysis, the accelerator poles stand out, located in states with high industrial maturity such as:

       Chihuahua

       Sonora

       Guanajuato

These regions concentrate available industrial inventory, specialized technical talent, and export integration, conditions that allow them to absorb complex manufacturing projects from early stages.

 

What? Are there relevant examples in the industrial development of these poles?

       Juárez, for its export leadership and pace of industrial expansion.

       Hermosillo, with strength in complex manufacturing and STEM talent.

       Celaya, supported by a highly integrated automotive ecosystem and strategic logistics connectivity.

These hubs reflect the immediate potential of industrial development in Mexico within the North American context.

How do balancing poles seek to expand territorial expansion and productive inclusion?

In contrast, balancing poles seek to close historical gaps and expand the geography of industrialization.

Among them highlight:

       Seybaplaya, Campeche

       Tapachula, Chiapas

       Teapa, Tabasco

Its objective is to enable new productive vocations, strengthen infrastructure, develop technical talent, and improve security conditions.

 

Above IDI Average

A. Plan México Accelerators

  • Chihuahua (San Jerónimo)
  • Durango (Logistics and Industrial Center)
  • State of Mexico (Nezahualcó&yotl)
  • Guanajuato (Puerta Logística del Bajío)
  • Sonora (Hermosilo-innovation and well-being)
  • Tamaulipas (Altamira)

C. Anchor states to connect

  • Aguascalientes (under evaluation)
  • Baja California
  • Mexico City (under evaluation)
  • Coahuila (under evaluation)
  • Jalisco
  • Querétaro (under evaluation)
  • Nuevo León
  • Saint Louis Potosí
Below IDI Average

B. Poles for closing gaps

  • Campeche (Seybaplaya)
  • Chiapas (CIIT PODEBI Poles)
  • Puebla (Capital Technology and Sustainability)
  • Quintana Roo (Chetumal)
  • Michoacán (Bajío Industrial)
  • Sinaloa (Topolobampo)
  • Tabasco (CIIT PODEBI Poles)
  • Tlaxcala (Huamantla)
  • Veracruz (Tuxpan + CIIT)

D. States absent to be included

  • Baja California Sur
  • Colima
  • Warrior(under evaluation)
  • Morelos
  • Nayarit
  • Yucatán (under evaluation)
  • Zacatecas
  PODECOBI formal Without PODECOBI

 

Although its impact will be Gradually, its role is fundamental to building a more inclusive industrial development model, aligned with the long-term vision of the Mexico Plan. How does the Mexico Plan fit into this new industrial interpretation? The joint analysis by the IDI and PODECOBI confirms that Mexico is going through a decisive moment.

"The joint analysis of the Industrial Development Index (IDI) and the PODECOBI offers us a current reading of the industrial moment the country is experiencing. Accelerating poles can attract sophisticated projects from the first year, while balancing poles expand the economic geography and address historical shortcomings. This matrix defines priorities, opportunities and limits of Plan México.

 

What What strategic objectives does the Mexico Plan seek to promote?

This integration transforms the Mexico Plan into a strategy guided by territorial evidence and real capabilities, oriented towards:

       Strengthen national supply

       Professionalize technical talent

       Guarantee energy and logistics infrastructure

       Consolidate Mexico as a key player in North American manufacturing

What? Does the intersection of the Industrial Development Index (IDI) and the Economic Development Poles for Well-being (PODECOBI) reveal anything about Mexico's industrial future?

The intersection of the Industrial Development Index (IDI) and the Economic Development Poles for Well-being (PODECOBI) offers more than just a diagnosis: it defines the path for the country's new manufacturing cycle.

In this context, the Mexico Plan (Plan México) is positioned as the strategic compass to promote competitive and inclusive industrial development. and territorially balanced, capable of responding to new global investment dynamics and strengthening Mexico's role within North American production chains.